​Big City Woos: It’s All About Amazon’s HQ2; Weinstein’s Ship Might Be Sinking But You Won’t Believe Who Might Come to its Rescue; Nords​trom’s Holding Out for a Santa Save

Pick me! Pick me!


Image courtesy of lekkyjustdoit/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

As a Thursday deadline looms, a heated race is on for cities across the United States (okay, and Canada too) as they toss away all their dignity in desperate attempts to woo Amazon and its latest project. The e-commerce giant announced about a month ago that it wants to set up a second headquarters, dubbed HQ2 and now there’s a mad dash from Atlanta to Grand Rapids and beyond to claim that glory, not to mention the $5 billion investment that comes with it. The fact that a project of this magnitude would also create around 50,000 jobs is the icing on this proverbial fiscal cake. Of course, Amazon’s got its own formula for picking the winning city and it’s got very little to do with Tucson delivering a 70 ft. saguaro cactus to Amazon’s Seattle door or Birmingham erecting giant replicas of Amazon boxes and strategically placing them around the city. For Amazon, it will probably boil down to which city will offer up the best tax incentives and breaks from local and state governments. In fact, the company has earned quite the reputation for being able to secure those tax breaks, whether through the promise of job creation or other financial packages that would have any major city’s mouth watering. Besides financial incentives for Amazon, any city that legitimately stands a snowball’s chance is also going to have to be in close proximity to a major airport,  possess the infrastructure to support the project, have easy access to mass transit and a population that boasts at least a million people to readily fill tens of thousands of jobs. That right there puts the kibosh on a bunch of contenders. But you know which cities analysts are expecting to see on the short list? Atlanta, Denver and Pittsburgh. As for Tucson and its aforementioned cactus, well you can visit the rejected botanical specimen at the Desert Museum.

It’s all a matter of perspective…or is it?


Image courtesy of Sira Anamwong/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The Weinstein Co. may be getting a much-needed cash-infusion to stay afloat in the wake of co-founder Harvey Weinstein’s ever-growing sexual harassment scandal. The cash-infusion could come from a private equity firm called Colony Capital, headed by an individual named Tom Barrack. If the name Tom Barrack rings a bell that’s because he served as chairman of President Trump’s Private Inaugural Committee and his name is being been bandied about as a pick for the White House Chief of Staff.  That’s right! Harvey Weinstein, an ardent Hillary Clinton supporter and staunch Democratic donor is probably getting a bailout from a Trump ally. But for Barrack, it’s all in a days work since he has a habit of picking up distressed companies in the entertainment realm, making all sorts of deals for the assets still in its clutches and making a mean mint in the process. Perhaps you can take comfort in the fact that there’s a good chance that this bailout will actually mean the Weinstein name disappears from the company, along with some of its honchos, because apparently, they knew about Harvey Weinstein’s sickening behavior for a long time. A sale could also mean that the Weinstein company, sans the name which is now synonymous with lechery, harassment, and abuse, could be restored to its former glory as a powerhouse of independent film and television production.

Let it snow let it snow let it snow…


Image courtesy of Sira Anamwong/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

We may still have Halloween ahead of us but Nordstrom is already gearing up for Christmas. The retailer, which has seen its share of loss in the last few quarters – along with every other retailer in the U.S. – previously had plans for the founding namesake family to take the company private. There’s talk that the family, who controls a third of the shares, was trying to team up with private equity firm Leonard Green Partners to achieve this goal. However, now those plans are on hold to until after the holiday shopping season because rumor has it, the Nordstroms have been experiencing some issues borrowing cash at a respectable rate, whatever that means. Interestingly enough, while the company isn’t faring as well in terms of same-store sales, its e-commerce is alive, well and thriving quite nicely.  Still, Wall Street didn’t much care for the news and sent shares plummeting over 6%  Those shares, by the way, are over 30% lower than its 52-week high of $62.82.


The White House Comes After Wall Street Advisors; January’s Frigid Housing Numbers; Target’s New Shipping Policy Gives Cause to Shop

Hard sell…

Image courtesy of ddpavumba/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of ddpavumba/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The White House is coming after Wall Street, in particular, financial advisors who might be a little too loose with money saved diligently by America’s middle class. President Obama wants the Labor Department to revamp its rules ensuring that retirement advisors put clients’ fiscal needs before their own bank accounts by putting the kibosh on hidden fees and conflicts of interest. Currently, investment advisors have this practice of suggesting expensive products to their clients that could at best be categorized as “suitable”  – but not “ideal.” In fact, these “suitable” investment products could cost a retiree five years worth of savings. Investment advisors would actually now be required to follow, dare I say it – a “fiduciary standard.” Many Republicans and financial firms, not to mention Republicans who work in financial firms, are just not that into this whole new idea of revamping the rules for two reasons that aren’t likely to elicit any sympathy: 1. They’re worried a new system will considerably shrink all the money they make in compensation fees and 2. They think the current system works just fine. However, the current system, according to White House, anyway, says it has cost unsuspecting working middle-class families an estimated $17 billion a year.  So who is this system working for, exactly? Hmmm.

Bring it home…

Image courtesy of hywards/FreeDigitalPhoos.net

Image courtesy of hywards/FreeDigitalPhoos.net

The number of existing homes that sold in January was 4.82 million. In case you were ready to celebrate…don’t. Those numbers suck. They suck because it’s a 4.9% drop from December and is at the lowest rate it has been in nine months. Nine months ago, (which by the way,  was May  – in case you didn’t feel like doing the math) saw 4.9 million homes sold. The National Association of Realtors provided us with these disappointing figures but all is not lost because, as it turns out, this 4.82 million figure is still 3.2% higher than it was a year ago. Naturally it wouldn’t be right if much of the blame didn’t go to Mother Nature who, it seems, loves nothing more than setting the bitter wintry stage for gloomy fiscal numbers. But with low interest rates and strong jobs numbers, here’s hoping spring will kick winter’s fiscal butt.

Aw’ ship…

Image courtesy of digitalart/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of digitalart/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Target has graciously decided to offer free shipping for online orders on just a $25 minimum purchase – with no exclusions, allegedly. Be still my beating consumer heart. If you recall – as I certainly do – Target was offering “free shipping” with a minimum $50 order. The retailer was inspired by the success it had when it offered free holiday season shipping through December 20, this past holiday season. It was an effort to compete with the slew of online retailers, but it payed off in more ways than one.  The company set new sales records for Thanksgiving and cyber-Monday and saw 60% of its website traffic come from mobile users. Once upon a time Amazon also offered free shipping with a $25 minimum purchase but alas, its investors got their way and Amazon was forced to up its minimum to $35. In the meantime, Walmart, while raising its minimum wage, has yet to change their free shipping policy, which offers the perk on only certain “eligible orders,” which seems a little too open to interpretation, as far as I’m concerned. Target also has big gigantic plans to open online fulfillment centers and if that doesn’t bode a Target/Amazon smack down then I don’t know what does. Target’s inventive digital app has also been doing particularly well in the popularity contest picking up a couple new million users and shooting past that pesky $1 billion promo sales mark.