Barclays Busted; Ford Ditches Mexico for China; UPS Gives Heads Up on Holiday Shipping

Cheerio…

ID-100302449

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Looks like 2008 is not done haunting banks that allegedly played dirty back then. Today’s banking scandal, that includes charges of conspiracy to commit fraud, is brought to us by Barclays and four of its former executives. The trouble started in 2008 when Barclays reached out to Qatar for some substantial cash that the bank was going to use to avoid a major government bailout. Barclays was inclined to hit up Qatar investors for some big money instead of getting a governmental bailout because a governmental bailout comes with major governmental oversight. And for banks, governmental oversight is a four letter word. Of course, asking help from the Qataris wasn’t exactly the problem. While there were two rounds of fundraising from Qatari investors, with one involving a $3 billion loan for Barclays, the UK bank also paid the Qataris $406 million in “fees.” It seems that last bit might not have been honestly and properly disclosed to shareholders. And that got authorities wondering if Barclays was trying to cover up the the gist of the plan because it might not necessarily have been totally legit. Besides, anytime there is suspicion of toying with shareholders, you can expect that there will be hell to pay.  These charges mark the first time that any bank in Britain got busted for questionably lawful behavior during the 2008 fiscal crisis. So congrats, Barclays. You now hold that dubious distinction. If convicted, the bank faces a nasty fine and the former execs each face up to ten years in prison if found guilty. As for the Qatari’s, they’re off the hook. Completely.

Adios…

ID-100456353

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Ford is ditching Mexico for China, at least as far as the Ford Focus is concerned.  Rumor has it that by ending all production of the vehicle in the U.S. and moving production to China instead of Mexico,  Ford will end up saving a whopping $1 billion. Which is especially weird since it is cheaper to build and import cars from Mexico as opposed to China. But here’s where the logic enters: Ford will now spend money to revamp just one factory in China instead of two in North America. Hence, billions of dollars in savings. While no U.S. jobs are expected to be affected, the United Auto Workers remained conspicuously silent regarding the news. This latest decision is the very first major one to come from Ford’s newly installed CEO Jim Hackett. However, what analysts are finding interesting is that this move shows how Ford is putting the focus – no pun intended – on SUV’s and trucks, as opposed to smaller, more fuel efficient cars, thanks to lower fuel costs. Besides, sales of the Ford Focus are down way over 20% since low gas prices are no longer standing in the way of those coveted SUV’s. The only question now is how is this move going to sit with President Trump and what will he tweet about it.

It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas…

ID-100103747

Image courtesy of stockimages/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Start saving up. Christmas is just around the corner and UPS wants to let you know that it will be charging you extra to ship those holiday presents. Between November 19 and December 2, the package carrier will slap on a 27 cents surcharge and then again, from December 17 – 23. If you want your package delivered via next day air, then prepare to whip out 81 cents and 97 cents for two or three day ground delivery.  UPS typically delivers around 30 million packages a day during the holiday season and analysts are expecting that will rise even more. And who can blame UPS for charging more money to deliver your goods? After all, the holidays are the company’s peak season where not only can their internal systems become over-whelmed, but mother-nature can throw out a few unhelpful surprises as well.

 

Advertisements

That’s All Folks: Yahoo Rides Off Into the Sunset; Uber Drama; Trump’s Attempts at Flattery; It’s Raining Tacos and Cheesecake Today

And that’s a wrap…

ID-100125129

Image courtesy of renjith krishnan/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Sometimes goodbyes are hard and sometimes goodbyes are worth $23 million. At least that’s the case for Marissa Mayer, who will be collecting that much cash now that Verizon’s $4.5 billion acquisition of Yahoo is a done deal. Gosh, imagine what she’d be collecting if she were asked to stay on board. In any case, Yahoo will now melt into the AOL vortex and together they will morph in a new entity profoundly named Oath. However, once that happens, over 2,000 employees can expect to kiss their jobs goodbye. The last itty bitty remaining pieces of Yahoo will be named Altaba in homage to the fact that it is primarily a holding company for Yahoo’s sizable stake in the Chinese e-commerce site Alibaba.

Other highlights from today…

ID-100137

Image courtesy of James Barker/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • It’s official: Uber CEO Travis Kalanick needs to compose his out-of-office reply. A management group will be established to run the show in his absence and when he returns he’ll be stripped of some of his duties. As for his return date, that is yet to be determined. It appears that he wont be missed that much. In the meantime, Uber now needs to come up with an effective system to tackle HR complaints. That might take awhile seeing as how the company is pretty much starting from scratch in that area.
  • In a meeting with Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, President Trump said to her that he thinks she’s a “low-interest person” like himself. Which is ironic since during his campaign he had plenty of criticism for the Fed because it kept those rates low. He also said he “likes her” and “respects her” which could mean anything and nothing when you’re President Donald Trump. Naturally, the Fed declined to comment, all while rumors swirl that it is expected to raise short-term interest rates for the fourth time in two years.
  • Go out and get yourself a free taco today. A Doritos Locos Taco, to be more specific. It’s on the house. At least at Taco Bell. The fast-food chain is being generous because the Golden State Warriors “stole” game 3 from the Cleveland Cavs. Naturally, it’s all part of a promotion, in this case the one that goes “Steal a Game, Steal a Taco.” Whatever. It’s free food.
  • Shares of Cheesecake Factory took a beating today because of Mother Nature. No, really. Apparently, because of some bad weather, customers near locations in the East and Midwest couldn’t enjoy enough “patio time” whilst eating copious amounts of cheesecake, thereby negatively affecting sales. And just like you, the analysts didn’t buy that excuse either.

Apple Throws Billions Towards U.S. Manufacturing; Ferrari Speeds into Double Digit Margins; Republicans Wage War on Dodd-Frank

iManufacture…

ID-100459831

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

China’s about to get some very unwelcome manufacturing competition from Apple. The tech giant just announced that it is starting a $1 billion fund promoting advanced manufacturing. Gosh, is the President going to take credit for this too? In fact, CNBC host Jim Cramer had the dubious distinction of being the first person to hear the news on his show “Mad Money.”  For those of you wondering what the difference is between manufacturing and “advanced manufacturing,” it means Apple will basically have to offer specialized skills and training for the latter and fill job gaps with these newly-trained, highly-skilled workers. In any case, Apple has thus far created some two million jobs in the U.S. and can hardly wait to create even more. But how does Apple plan on spending that $1 billion it’s setting aside for this latest project? Well, don’t get too excited just yet, because some of that cash is first going to a company that Apple has partnered with for this initiative. And the name of that lucky company has yet to be announced.

Magnifico!

ID-100156810

Image courtesy of Teerapun/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Ah Ferrari. What could be better than tooling around in a machine like that? How about its earnings, for one. The Italian automaker just released its first quarter earnings report and they were everything you’d expect from the maker of one of the world’s finest sports cars. Shares are up well over 6% today after the company announced a 36% earnings increase along with a 50% surge in deliveries. And by the way, those earnings were even better than expected, coming in at around $265 million  – which equals 242 million euros – in case you were curious. Estimates, mind you, were for 222 million euros. Revenues also impressed and elated investors, as they increased 22% to 821 million euros, easily beating expectations of 767 million euros.  Sure, those numbers are almost magical, but that’s not really what’s got Wall Street tongues wagging. It was Ferrari’s margins, which are now right up there with the aforementioned tech giant we call Apple. But I guess that’s to be expected when you’re selling cars whose ticket prices start well into the six-figures and can exceed $2 million. After all, we are talking about a company who sold out of a car, the Aperta convertible, before the car even made its official debut.

Let’s me be Dodd-Frank with you…

ID-1002246

Image courtesy of Tony Dowson/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Things are looking grim for Dodd-Frank, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Republican-led House Financial Services Committee argued that the law sucks for the economy since it slows it down, and today passed a bill that would overhaul and repeal parts of it. It certainly helps Republicans that President  Trump promised way back in his campaign to overhaul the law, which he says costs banks a fortune in compliance and limits lending way too much. Democrats argue the opposite and are convinced that the bill, if passed, will once again create the same conditions that led to the 2008 fiscal crisis. In case it wasn’t obvious, the law was initially passed under President Barack Obama. Naturally, Democrats voted against the bill and lost 34-26.

UnFriendly Skies Take a Well-Deserved Beating; FY-Infosys – Americans Getting on Payrolls; Paid Internships vs. Actual Job

Turbulent…

ID-100346650

Image courtesy of satit_srihin/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The day of reckoning has finally come for airlines and their awful and questionably lawful treatment of its passengers. If you recall, the impetus for this day stemmed from a recent United Airlines flight, where a passenger, David Dao, was forcibly dragged off a plane and left with a litany of injuries including a concussion and broken teeth. So over at the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee there was a hearing where airline execs insisted that they’ve been working to improve the situations that have been responsible for all the recent bad press. United CEO Oscar Munoz apologized again at the hearing for the recent tussle that cost his airline a presumably hefty settlement.  Of course plenty of blame has been pointed at unruly passengers. But then again who can blame them? Flights have gotten more crowded, equipment and tech failures have been resulting in delays on a fairly regular basis and obnoxious fees keep cropping up like a bad fungus. And don’t even get me started on the practice of over-booking flights. Apparently, a few airlines are rethinking their policies on that issue.  In the meantime, lawmakers are warning they’ll slap on major legislation if things don’t improve and they promise it wont be pretty.

Trump’d…

ID-100260281

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

A company based in India, with 200,000 employees worldwide, is now on the line to hire 10,000 workers in the U.S. Enter Infosys, one of a number of companies who engage in outsourcing – a four letter word according to the President – because the practice takes jobs away from Americans. Now, the company announced plans to open four new centers in the United States in the next two years. In the past, Infosys and other similar companies have relied on work visas for its employees. But now President Trump has ordered a major review and overhaul of that program. That’s expected to lead to some very unpleasant changes for companies who are used to employing foreigners in the United States, instead of tapping into the talent pool already present in the country. As for Infosys’s CEO, Vishal Sikka, who happens to be based in Palo Alto (oh, the irony), he explained that “…bringing in local talent and mixing that with the best of global talent in the times we are living in and the times we’re entering is the right thing to do. It is independent of the regulations and the visas.” Of course it is.

How do you like your coffee?

ID-100323069

Image courtesy of David Castillo Dominici/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

If you’re not having the easiest time finding a job, maybe getting a position as an intern might be the better way to go. And leave it to Glassdoor to unearth the 25 highest paying internships in the United States. You see, the median annual salary in the U.S. for a full time worker is $51,350 – or about $4,300 a month. An internship gig at Facebook – provided you can even get one  – is worth $8,000 a month. Plus, as a Facebook intern, you get room and board, free food, transportation…Does it get any better than that? Just good luck. You’ll need it. Actually, you’ll really need computer science skills. But that’s besides the point. Microsoft comes in second with a paycheck that is about a thousand dollars less a month than what you’d get at Facebook. But former interns can’t stop raving about the projects they got to work on. Rounding out the third spot is ExxonMobil. While it’s not tech-related, it is a company that is highly focused on professional development of its interns. And who couldn’t use some of that? Amazon and Apple take spots fifth and sixth, respectively, and they’ll both keep you in style for about $6,400 a month. While the tech companies seem to dominate much of the list, there are still plenty of opportunities to map out a career in banking. If you’re sure that’s your thing.

White House Tax Plan Causing Quite the Stir; Twitter’s Very Good Day/Quarter; Silicon Valley Start-Up Eats $1.6M for Discrimination

So taxing…

ID-100266470

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The White House whipped out its opening bid for what it’s calling the “biggest tax cut.” Well, in U.S. history anyway. So who’s supposedly getting a nice break? The middle class, for one, along with some businesses and, naturally, some wealthy individuals, among others.  While President Trump’s top economic adviser Gary Cohn and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin want corporations to pay a 15% tax rate, the plan also calls for a one-time tax payment on earnings that U.S. companies keep outside the U.S. Apparently this new tax cut is meant to be all about simplicity, giving a much-needed boost to the small-business sector while putting some cash back into pockets of the middle-class. Individual rates would change, with the top rate dropping from almost 40% to 35%, and instead of having seven brackets of rates, we’d have just three.  Those cuts sound great, in theory, however, questions remain as to who will be paying for these cuts and how will they be paying for them.

It did what?!

ID-100423570

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

We’ll start with the bad news. Twitter’s year-over-year revenue declined for the first time  ever to $548 million. But miracle of miracle – hey, we are talking about Twitter, after all – the social media company beat analysts expectations on everything else. TWITTER BEAT EXPECTATIONS. While last year’s revenue at this time was a much higher $595 million, it still wasn’t anywhere near dismal expectations of $512 million for this quarter. User growth has been a fiscal thorn in Twitter’s side. But perhaps the social media tide is turning because Twitter added 9 million more monthly active users bringing its grand total to 328 million users. 9 MILLION users added. You know what anaylyst expected? 2.3 million. Twitter effectively blew those estimates out of the water. As for the other numbers, the company earned 11 cents per share when expectations were for one single solitary cent. In other words, Twitter beat those estimates by a dime. Twitter explained that its impressive earnings were due in part to increased political interest – which sounds about right, especially given President Trump’s highly entertaining tendency to tweet before he thinks. Also, Twitter’s efforts to simplify use on the platform and putting greater focus on stamping out abuse seem to have helped matters…and figures.  Naturally, shares enjoyed a much appreciated increase today, soaring way past $16 a share.

Pony up…

ID-100221512

Image courtesy of pakorn/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Palantir Technologies may be valued at $20 billion, but it’s about to lose $1.6 million of it as part of a settlement with the U.S. Department Labor. Charges were brought against the data-analytics company that it discriminated against Asians. Besides the money the company has to cough up, which will go towards back pay and stock options to affected applicants, Palantir also has to hire eight people, who had previously applied to the company, for two different types of engineering roles. According to the government’s complaint, Asians were “routinely eliminated” on the basis of their resumes and telephone interviews. But apparently, Palantir should consider itself lucky that the case didn’t end up going to court. If it had and lost, the penalties would have been so much worse. That $1.6 million is chump change compared to what it might have been had the company been found guilty. And that would be in addition to being added to a list that bars certain companies from doing business in the government sector. Palantir has so far enjoyed hundreds of millions of dollars from such contracts. Of course, Palantir disagrees with the allegations, refuses to admit to any wrongdoing and claims that it only settled so that it could carry on business without further interruptions. Incidentally, Palantir’s co-founded is Peter Thiel, one of President’s Trump’s biggest Silicon Valley supporters and cheerleaders from the start.

VW Still Writing Checks for its Bad Behavior; Lululemon’s Sour Outlook; Economy Shows Some Impressive Muscle

Putting this baby to bed…

ID-100128578

Image courtesy of nirots/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Looks like Volkswagen will be handing over $157 million to ten U.S. states to settle environmental claims over the auto company’s notorious diesel emissions scandal. Among the lucky – if you can call it that – recipients of these funds are New York, which snagged $32.5 million, Connecticut which took in $20 million, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maine, Rhode Island, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, which all took in various amounts of the remaining settlement.  Incidentally, that $157 million was well below what the states originally sought. There was already a previous $603 million settlement with 44 other states, but this latest one is separate from that. In fact, the German car company has agreed to spend up to $25 billion to settle claims and make buyback offers. Just wondering if that means it will actually hit that figure or will the company try and do their best to come in as under as possible.  As part of this latest ten-state settlement, VW now has to offer three new electric vehicles in those states. Two of those vehicles need to be SUV’s. Which to me, looks like a bit of a win for VW, but hey, what do I know. In the meantime, as part of a $4.3 billion settlement with the Department of Justice, VW pleaded guilty to fraud, obstruction of justice and falsifying of documents in a district court in Detroit earlier this month. The company can also look forward to major audits, oversight and monitoring for the next three years. Sort of like what Wells Fargo has to go through as payback for its fraudulent account scandal. Am I seeing a pattern?

Soured…

ID-100420194

Image courtesy of khumthong/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Fancy trendy yoga apparel maker Lululemon was upsetting Wall Street’s zen today after announcing that its first quarter sales marked a “slow start” to the year. Which is  really just CEO code for “Yikes! Our quarter sucked.” And with that news, shares of the company took a very ugly 23% plunge to $51 a pop, a stock price the company hasn’t seen since December of 2015. This news was especially weird because Lululemon did better in holiday sales than most other clothing retailers. Yet now, this quarter now becomes the very first one in seven years to see same store sales go down. The company took in almost $790 in revenue with a $136 million profit that added 99 cents per share, even though analysts were expecting that figure to be closer to $784 million with a $1.01 profit per share. Last year at this time the company made off with a $117 million profit that added 85 cents per share. Competition from Nike and Under Armour definitely turned up the heat on the super-pricey Lululemon, with their vast offerings and more affordable selections. But CEO Laurent Potdevin blamed the company’s neutral offerings instead, arguing that they lacked  “depth and color for spring” that consumers are apparently craving. That’s got to be it, right?

Yes, you need to know this…

ID-100328948

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

There was a lot of spending this quarter. A lot. In fact, consumer spending was so strong that it caused the economy’s GDP to grow at a 2.1% rate, more than what was thought in initial estimates. In the process, that impressive growth rate even made up for areas of the economy that didn’t perform up to snuff, like trade and business investing. In fact, for all of 2017, analysts are actually expecting to see a 2.3% rate of growth. Of course, the fact that the labor market is strong, with higher incomes and wages, helps with all that consumer spending as well. Naturally. That 2.1% rate is a major upward shift from last year at this time when that rate stood at 1.6% and had the dubious distinction of being the weakest period of growth in five years. This next bit may cause you to cringe, but one of the reasons for this anticipated impressive growth rate is President Trump. He’s got plans, in case you hadn’t heard, for tax cuts and spending. Say what you will, but moves like that help economies. And who doesn’t like a little economic boost.  However, if it makes you feel any better, Trump thinks he can get that rate up to 4%, and economists are laughing on the inside at him for even thinking he can pull off that feat.

Bill Gates Is So Not Into President’s Budget Blueprint; Does Uber Have Some High-Level Job Openings?

Just letting you know…

ID-10082261

Image courtesy of Naypong/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Chances are if Bill Gates is not into your budget blueprint, then maybe it’s worth it to make a few (hundred-billion dollar) changes to it.  Which explains one of the reasons why the world’s richest man is in DC today, to have a little chat with the President of the United States.  Bill Gates, who knows a thing or two, isn’t taking too kindly to President Trump’s budget blueprint, particularly the part about cutting foreign aid. Gates is of the very informed and highly researched opinion, that providing foreign aid not only assists the world’s poorest individuals, but it also helps Americans. A lot. Gates said as much in a recent TIME op-ed piece, explaining how foreign aid actually decreases global conflicts, strife and get this…political instability. There’s a joke in there somewhere, but I’ll leave you to make it. Feel free to leave it in the comments. In any case, Mr. Gates went on to say, “These projects [foreign aid] keep Americans safe. And by promoting health, security and economic opportunity, they stabilize vulnerable parts of the world.” I think the philanthropist billionaire/Microsoft co-founder just might be onto something, no?

Outta here…

ID-100144414

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

As if a lawsuit from Google and claims of sexual harassment couldn’t make things any worse for Uber, things are about to get even more awkward – if that’s possible – with two very high-level execs saying buh-bye to the ride-hailing app. First we have President Jeff Jones, who is leaving after less than a year on the job. It seems that a few weeks ago, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick announced he was seeking new leadership, along with plans to install a new COO. Rumor has it that that bit might have had something to do with Jones untimely departure. In the meantime, Jones explained, in his own special spin that “…the beliefs and approach to leadership that have guided my career are inconsistent with what I saw and experienced at Uber, and I can no longer continue as president of the ride sharing business.” You just know there’s an ugly, yet presumably very juicy story behind that articulate statement. But I guess we’ll just have o wait for the book to come out. Naturally, Uber officially thanked Jones and wished “him all the best” no doubt with the utmost sincerity. The other Uber exit is brought to us by Brian McClendon, who is set to ditch his post of Vice President of Maps and Business Platforms. Mr. McClendon announced plans to return to his native Kansas to pursue a career in politics. He’s apparently very disenchanted with the state of Kansas’ fiscal crisis and presumably the rest of the political climate. At least that’s the story he’s sticking to.

Buy buy baby…

ID-100283465

Image courtesy of furuoda/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Well, at least somebody has finally stepped up who has a bit of faith in Snap Inc. Enter James Cakmak, a Wall Street analyst with the firm Monness, Crespi, Hardt, who gave the app its very first – and only –  “buy” rating, slapping it with a $25 price target. And fyi, Snap identifies itself as a camera company. Got it? Having the dubious distinction of being crowned as the biggest tech IPO in two years, Snap managed to raise a whopping $3.4 billion its first day out. It went up almost 60% on its first day but since then came barreling back down over 25%. Its shares have been losing steam over concerns that the company has a ridiculously high valuation, yet grim prospects for profits. Cakmak graciously said that he’s giving Snap the benefit of the doubt because, even though he himself is unsure if Snap will be able to crank out an actual profit, he likes the way the company stacks up against its competitors. Awww.