Raise Praise for Walmart ; Pinterest Tries to Double Up; Priceline’s Beamed Up Earnings

You raise me up…

Image courtesy of nongpimmy/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of             nongpimmy/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

It’s a good day to be a Walmart employee. No, seriously. It is. The gargantuan retailer just announced it’ll be raising the salaries of some 500,000 of its hardworking employees raising to about $1.75 more than the Federal minimum wage. Full-time employees will go from an average of $12.85 an hour to about $13 per hour. Part-timers will see their paychecks go up to $10 per hour from the average $9.50 they make now. The pay-raise fun begins in April and CEO Doug McMillon says it’s all part of a master plan to improve customer service, employee morale, etc. Those are all nice and pleasant things, of course, but no doubt Walmart is really hoping it will also lead to higher sales and profit. Walmart figures higher pay will help attract and retain employees that know the value of good customer service. And if it improves its somewhat tarnished reputation for its lousy pay practices in the process then why not?  So how bad could their pay practices have been that the company is implementing this change? Well, a majority of its employees’ salaries were so low that, all together, they were eligible to receive millions – I repeat, millions – of dollars in public benefits.  This initiative will cost Walmart about $1 billion, but hey, you’re worth it.

 In the land of unicorns…

Image courtesy of vectorolie/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of vectorolie/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The next social media darling that may be headed off to the wonderful, not-so-mystical land of Silicon Valley “unicorns” is Pinterest. By “unicorns,” I am referring to billion dollar startups, a term thoughtfully coined by Cowboy Ventures founder Aileen Lee. But apparently these “unicorns” are turning out to be a bit more ubiquitous than previously thought as Pinterest is but among a larger group of “unicorns” and “decacorns” and “super-unicorns”…but I digress. Founded by CEO Ben Silbermann, Pinterest graciously allows users to “pin” images of all kinds of stuff that appeals to them on their boards, thereby bringing light and joy to the world. And now Pinterest is said to be adding a “buy” button. That ought to bring even more light and joy. Adding e-commerce into the social media start-up picture tends to prove lucrative on so many levels. Pinterest is rumored to be raising funds to the tune of $500 million. Any takers? This new round of funding would put the company in the $11 billion valuation stratosphere, nearly doubling its $5 billion valuation it had back in May.

But what does this mean for Captain Kirk?

Image courtesy of jscreationzs/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of jscreationzs/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Priceline, the company shilled by the inimitable William Shatner, beat Wall Street estimates for its fourth quarter earnings taking in almost $452 million with adjusted earnings at $10.85 per share. Well beam me up on those numbers, Scottie, because analysts only expected Priceline to score $10.05 per share. Those impressive digits were helped by growth from hotel and car rental reservations. Revenues were $1.84 billion and, once again, those analysts predicted the online travel booking service would only rake in $1.8 billion. Naturally, shares of Priceline took a joyous upswing in the news and clearly sending the message to Wall Street that the Orbitz-Expedia deal didn’t seem to have any adverse affects on the company. Well, not yet, anyway. If you’re in the market for some shares of Priceline, it’ll only set you back about $1,200.00…per share.

Advertisements

United Sues Resourceful Computer Whiz; Twitter Is Making A Follower Out of You; California’s Bagged Out

Hide and seek the city…

Image courtesy of anankkml/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of anankkml/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

United Airlines and Orbitz are suing a 22 year old computer whiz for doing something that isn’t necessarily illegal. The very resourceful and industrious Aktarer Zaman found a nifty little way to score some reasonably priced seats on airlines and runs a website called Skiplagged.com. Dubbed the “hidden city” strategy, you simply purchase a ticket that happens to have a layover in your destination city and then just skip the last leg of the flight. But you need to make sure it’s a one-way ticket and don’t check bags, since the bags will most definitely end up in the final destination even if you have no intention of ever going there. While others call the idea genius, United Airlines and Orbitz have, no doubt, other choice words for Zaman and are seeking $75,000 in lost revenue. (Even though airlines are reporting record profits, but I digress). Zaman, however, alleges he hasn’t made any profit from the website and argues that all he did was expose an “inefficiency.” United and Orbitz call it unfair competition and “strictly prohibited travel” (boohoo), even though the airlines are well aware of “hidden cities” which have been around for many years now.

I’m a leader, not a follower!

Image courtesy of Master isolated images/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of Master isolated images/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Twitter started a new experiment by selling ad space on your timeline. But Will Shatner doesn’t like it. Not one single bit. All the hoopla began when the Star Trek legend noticed a MasterCard ad appearing on his “following” list.  This peeved the actor and Priceline sheller quite a bit, especially because he wasn’t following MasterCard’s account. Shatner then tweeted, “Why am I following MasterCard when I didn’t add them? I do not appreciate this.” Here here, Captain Kirk. Mr. Shatner, and presumably others, don’t like that it might be assumed that they are promoting and endorsing brands just because Twitter put those brands on their “following” lists. Shatner, it appears is not the only celebrity who seems to have brands appearing in their following lists.  Non-celebrities have this issue too, but who cares about them. While Twitter has been engaging in this practice since 2013, there is no word yet on how the micro-blogging website will proceed with Mr. Shatner’s complaints. And those of regular people, as well.

I’m bagging you to please stop…

Image courtesy of winnond/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of winnond/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Looks like Californians weren’t digging the plastic bag ban, after all. Opponents of the plastic bag ban collected a whopping 800,000 plus signatures to force a referendum on the issue, an especially impressive feat since only 504,000 signatures were actually needed. The American Progressive Bag Alliance (I swear I could not make that up if I tried) which is made up of several business groups and plastic bag manufacturers said that Senate Bill 270, aka the plastic bag ban, has less to do with helping the environment than it does with money. The APBA said “SB270” was basically a “back room deal” since stores make money by getting consumers to purchase reusable bags from them. Californians Against Waste are hearing none of that, arguing that the culprit-y bags not only pollute the environment but then have the nerve not to bio-degrade on top of it. The group also says that plastic bag manufacturers profit by selling $200 million worth of bags so it’s in their best interest to keep those bags around. In any case, once the signatures are validated, the fate of the bags, reusable and otherwise, will rest in the hands of California voters.