Converse: Back the Chuck Off!; BofA Bummer; Whole Foods: I’ll Give That Tomato a 6

Chuck it…


Converse, the force behind one of the most iconic shoes ever, not to mention my favorite pair of kicks, is heading to the courts. The legal courts, that is. The Massachusettes-based shoe company, a subsidiary of Nike, is suing 31 other companies for trademark infringement which basically means those companies have allegedly been ripping off the way cool, timeless design that has found their way onto famous feet since 1908. The company has reportedly spent hundreds of millions of dollars promoting the shoe and, in my most humble opinion, if there were/is such a thing as a shoe hall of fame, then Chuck Taylors ought to be inducted in to it. Just saying. Among the companies being sued are Wal-Mart, K-Mart and Skechers, not to mention Ralph Lauren and Tory Burch. I might add that I wear my Chuck Taylors regularly except I don’t think that’s going to help bolster Converse’s case. Converse is also filing a complaint with the International Trade Commission hoping to prevent counterfeit look-alikes from making their way onto our shores.

Hind quarters…

Image courtesy of digitalart/

Image courtesy of digitalart/

BofA has surely had better quarters. The second largest bank (by assets, mind you) had a net income of $168 million losing $0.01 per share. A year ago at this time BofA earned $0.20 per share on $2.2 billion. Ah well, the past is in the past. But at least it’s not as bad as the $0.09 loss per share predicted by analysts. BofA can thank Uncle Sam for its quarterly losses as BofA had to shell out about $16.65 billion to the DOJ in settlement fees for the bank’s prominent, unappreciated role in the 2008 financial crisis and all those awful mortgages.

On a scale of 1 to 10…

Image courtesy of Pixomar/

Image courtesy of Pixomar/

Whole Foods is getting in on the ratings game.  Next time you stop in at one of their 400 plus stores, check to see if that head of lettuce falls under the “good,” “better,” or “best” category. Yes, your produce will now be categorized because the organic wholesaler wants you to know to what degree your chosen produce is affected by pesky pesticide and less than pleasing farming methods. Other factors that will be taken into consideration when scoring your produce include the amount of energy and water used. Indeed, several environmental factors can and will directly impact the score of that apricot you’ve been eyeing. No word yet if those environmental impacts will have an “impact” on your wallet but Whole Foods might also want to consider a scoring system for the price of its produce and flowers. For instance, it could rate its merchandise as “cheap,” “expensive,” and “I’m about to blow half my paycheck on a pineapple.”

One response to “Converse: Back the Chuck Off!; BofA Bummer; Whole Foods: I’ll Give That Tomato a 6

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s